Synthetic workflow / API → LLM → CRM
A workflow should reduce work without hiding its decisions.
Run the same lead through intake, classification, CRM write, and human handoff. The useful part is not the green check—it is the refusal, retry, and evidence when the path is imperfect.
RomeoApps-owned synthetic proof. Local adapters only: no credentials, network requests, customer records, or external writes.
01 / replay the workflow
Choose a case. Make the boundary visible.
The adapters are deliberately local and deterministic. That keeps the proof inspectable: a buyer can see the same input, decision, failure path, and acceptance result every time.
Ready lead → observable handoff
The workflow accepts a complete request, classifies it, writes one deduplicated CRM record, and leaves a human-readable next action.
- The trace will record inputs, decisions, retries, and receipts in order.
02 / measure the handoff
Less manual movement. More visible state.
This is a synthetic benchmark of the fixture, not a claim about a customer’s savings. It makes the engineering trade-off explicit before a real workflow is scoped.
Read message → copy fields → interpret request → search CRM → check duplicates → create record → write note → assign follow-up.
Validate → classify → dedupe/write → hand off with a receipt. Failure cases stop before an external side effect.
03 / acceptance matrix
The happy path is only one test.
Every fixture has a named terminal state. “Handled” is not a substitute for a receipt.
| Fixture | Failure seam | Expected terminal state | External writes | Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ready lead | none | PASS handoff issued | 0 / synthetic store only | CRM receipt + next action |
| Bad intake | missing email | HOLD before model | 0 | validation reason |
| Duplicate event | same event twice | DEDUPE no second write | 0 | stable event key |
| CRM retry | transient adapter error | RETRY → PASS one receipt | 0 / synthetic store only | attempt ledger |
04 / architecture note
A thin vertical slice you can inspect.
The public fixture uses adapters with the same seams a production build would need. Swapping in buyer-approved providers is a later paid scope, not silently implied here.
What is real here: the deterministic state machine, test cases, event trace, failure boundaries, receipt schema, and local execution.
What remains a paid integration scope: provider credentials, customer data, production CRM writes, model selection, deployment, monitoring, and buyer-owned acceptance.
05 / truth boundary
Proof that stops where access begins.
Verified by this page
- Four-stage synthetic API → LLM → CRM → handoff flow.
- Validation, dedupe, transient retry, and terminal receipts.
- Repeatable 4-case acceptance matrix with zero network requests.
- Illustrative 8-to-4 synthetic step comparison.
Not claimed
- Customer ROI, production uptime, or vendor-specific results.
- Access to private CRM, API keys, model accounts, or customer records.
- Autonomous deployment, paid work, or an employer selection.
- That synthetic adapters are a client case study.
Fit before payment
Bring one workflow that must become explainable.
For a real build, start with a written target, the desired outcome, safe evidence, the acceptance owner, and the first paid milestone. No credentials or customer data are needed for the fit check.
Request a written fit