Romeo Apps

RomeoApps-owned learning proof

AI Evidence Check

Confidence is not evidence.

A seven-minute learning prototype that helps people pause, verify, and scope-check an AI answer before it becomes a business action.

Synthetic, privacy-safe, and built by Romeo Apps. No customer content, learner tracking, or outcome claims.

  1. 01
    Notice Spot the claim behind the confident tone.
  2. 02
    Verify Check source, scope, and time.
  3. 03
    Decide Act only inside the evidence boundary.
7 mintarget duration
EN / ITlocalization pattern
SCORM 1.2working package
AA-mindedkeyboard + reduced motion

Make the decision, then inspect the method.

This interaction keeps all answers in your browser. Nothing is sent or stored.

Baseline 1 / 3

A confident answer arrives

The assistant says the policy is safe to publish.

“The 2026 review confirmed that this wording can be used in every market.”

What is your first move?

Three checks. One observable habit.

The module reduces a broad “use AI responsibly” message to a repeatable decision behavior that can be practiced and observed.

  1. Source

    Can the learner open the cited source and identify who owns it?

  2. Scope

    Does the evidence support this exact claim, audience, and market?

  3. Time

    Is the source current enough for the decision being made now?

Every screen earns its place.

Audience: professionals using generative AI in everyday work. Target behavior: pause and check source, scope, and time before acting.

  1. 01
    Cold open

    A believable AI answer creates urgency without explaining the lesson first.

    Decision baseline
  2. 02
    Consequence

    Feedback names the risk in the learner’s choice without shaming the learner.

    Specific feedback
  3. 03
    Compact model

    Source, scope, and time become one short, reusable verification sequence.

    Worked example
  4. 04
    Transfer case

    A different business context tests whether the behavior transfers.

    Post decision
  5. 05
    Job aid

    The learner leaves with a three-line check, not a summary slide.

    Performance support
Read the source storyboard →

A package a reviewer can open.

The downloadable archive contains a standalone HTML course and a SCORM 1.2 manifest. When an LMS API is present, it initializes the session, reports raw score, and marks completion. Without an LMS, it runs safely in the browser.

  • Manifest resource and launch file
  • Graceful standalone fallback
  • No external scripts, fonts, or trackers
  • Keyboard-operable answer controls
  • Source, storyboard, and evaluation notes
romeoapps-ai-evidence-check/
├── imsmanifest.xml
├── index.html
├── course.css
├── scorm.js
└── course.json

Built for review, reuse, and restraint.

Accessibility

  • Semantic headings and native buttons
  • Visible focus and no color-only answer state
  • Live feedback announced after each choice
  • Reduced-motion support

Localization

  • UI strings separated from interaction logic
  • English and Italian scenario pattern
  • Flexible layouts for longer translated copy
  • No text embedded in images

AI boundary

  • AI supports drafting and variation
  • Human-owned sources define correctness
  • No simulated model output is presented as fact
  • No learner data leaves the page

Measure a decision, not applause.

This is a proposed measurement design, not a claim of observed learner or business results.

Signal Measure Decision use
Learning Baseline vs. transfer-case accuracy Revise feedback when the method does not transfer
Behavior Sampled evidence-check use after 14 days Add a job aid or manager prompt when use falls away
Business Avoidable AI-claim corrections per 100 reviewed outputs Scale only if the error trend improves

One learning prototype. Five business days.

EUR 450 for one five-to-eight-minute bilingual-ready web module: storyboard, responsive interaction, SCORM 1.2 package, accessibility pass, evaluation plan, and one factual correction round. Source files are standards-based HTML/CSS/JavaScript, not an Articulate source file.

Request a written fit check